Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- todd_little_and_andrew_tuttle_-_performance_reviews_that_don_t_suck [2018/05/15 12:56] – hpsamios
+++ todd_little_and_andrew_tuttle_-_performance_reviews_that_don_t_suck [2020/06/02 14:22] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ====== Action / Learning ======
-  * Excellent - get in touch with Todd re background
+  * Offers up an approach that allows you to leverage performance appraisal systems that will help move agile
+  * Rather than ignore HR (standard agile approach) idea is to engage with HR to move process in right direction
+  * Like idea of splitting impact from behaviors and the definition of impact
+  * Like the idea of using shu-ha-ri type model to define improvements in skills / behaviors
+  * Like the idea of using "impact" to drive increases in levels
+  * Like the idea that when you go to a new level (promotion) you should treat it like it is a new job and so you are automatically at "shu" level.
 ====== Presentation ======
@@ Line 31: / Line 36: @@
 Joke: "SOS - smart objectives suck"
 SMART Objectives are in fact DUMB
-  * Don't comprehend uncertainty
+  * (D)on't comprehend uncertainty
-  * Unintended consequences
+  * (U)nintended consequences
-  * Myopic approach to career coaching
+  * (M)yopic approach to career coaching
-  * Behind every objective is a subjective interpretation
+  * (B)ehind every objective is a subjective interpretation
 Deming - abolish performance reviews