User Tools

Site Tools


how_do_we_get_away_from_business_as_usual_thinking_on_teams

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
how_do_we_get_away_from_business_as_usual_thinking_on_teams [2019/01/22 18:51] – [Want To Know More?] Updated links hpsamioshow_do_we_get_away_from_business_as_usual_thinking_on_teams [2019/01/22 18:53] – [The Proactive Retrospective] hpsamios
Line 33: Line 33:
   * Impediment mining: Become more aware of recurring problems by looking through threads of messages in your email. Or perhaps look at the reasons you are having meetings. With “impediment mining” your email client can be a great source of potential problems with value delivery. Also look at your retrospectives over time. Do you see the same problems come up time and again. Perhaps you should do something about these?   * Impediment mining: Become more aware of recurring problems by looking through threads of messages in your email. Or perhaps look at the reasons you are having meetings. With “impediment mining” your email client can be a great source of potential problems with value delivery. Also look at your retrospectives over time. Do you see the same problems come up time and again. Perhaps you should do something about these?
  
-(Note: I am indebted to Tom Perry'"Little Book of Impediments" for this list.)+(Note: I am indebted to [[https://www.amazon.com/Little-Book-Impediments-Thomas-Perry-ebook/dp/B01D8VYWZG|"Little Book of Impediments" by Tom Perry]] for this list.)
  
 In many ways, this thinking approach is really about increasingly seeing the whole system, seeing the Team’s part in that system, and seeing where the problems and impediments are. Once we have identified the problems, the usual Retrospective steps apply - root cause analysis, ideas to address, plan of action (including backlog items and experiment), then review results at next Retrospective. In many ways, this thinking approach is really about increasingly seeing the whole system, seeing the Team’s part in that system, and seeing where the problems and impediments are. Once we have identified the problems, the usual Retrospective steps apply - root cause analysis, ideas to address, plan of action (including backlog items and experiment), then review results at next Retrospective.
- 
 ====== Supporting Significant Change ====== ====== Supporting Significant Change ======
  
Line 46: Line 45:
  
   * [[how_do_we_run_our_first_sprint_retrospective|How Do We Run Our First Sprint (or Iteration) Retrospective?]]   * [[how_do_we_run_our_first_sprint_retrospective|How Do We Run Our First Sprint (or Iteration) Retrospective?]]
-  * See [[https:%%//%%www.amazon.com/Agile-Retrospectives-Making-Pragmatic-Programmers-ebook/dp/B00B03SRJW/|"Agile Retrospectives - Making Good Teams Great" by Esther Derby]]: for structure of the retrospective so that you are working real problems as well as activities to improve engagement. +  * See [[https://www.amazon.com/Agile-Retrospectives-Making-Pragmatic-Programmers-ebook/dp/B00B03SRJW/|"Agile Retrospectives - Making Good Teams Great" by Esther Derby]]: for structure of the retrospective so that you are working real problems as well as activities to improve engagement. 
-  * See [[https:%%//%%www.amazon.com/Little-Book-Impediments-Thomas-Perry-ebook/dp/B01D8VYWZG|"Little Book of Impediments" by Tom Perry]]: for more on working a proactive retrospective+  * See [[https://www.amazon.com/Little-Book-Impediments-Thomas-Perry-ebook/dp/B01D8VYWZG|"Little Book of Impediments" by Tom Perry]]: for more on working a proactive retrospective
  
 {{tag>FAQ Retrospective Improvement}} {{tag>FAQ Retrospective Improvement}}
/home/hpsamios/hanssamios.com/dokuwiki/data/pages/how_do_we_get_away_from_business_as_usual_thinking_on_teams.txt · Last modified: 2023/03/10 07:04 by hans